Last full review 14 September 2026

How we verify what we publish

A guide to a trading tool is only useful if its numbers are right. This page lists where every type of claim on gmgn-ai.net comes from, how often we re-check it, and the things we refuse to publish.

Which sources do we use?

How do we turn fee data into volume?

DefiLlama records what GMGN users pay in fees per chain per day, and its methodology states those fees are 1% per trade. Where we give an implied trading volume, we divide the fee figure by 1%. It is an estimate: it ignores any fee exceptions GMGN does not publish. We always show the underlying fee number next to it.

How often are pages re-checked?

• Fees and bot handles: checked on every site update and at least monthly, because these are what people act on.
• Chain data: refreshed from DefiLlama when we update chain pages; each page shows the date the data runs to.
• New chains: when GMGN announces a chain, we add a page once there is documentation or independent fee data to cite.

What do we refuse to publish?

• Fee discounts, cashback rates or referral percentages that GMGN does not publish.
• User counts, ratings or rankings without a source we can link.
• Activity estimates for chains without independent data. Tron has no DefiLlama series, so its page has none.
• Token recommendations or price predictions.

How can you check our work?

Every factual section links to or names its source. If you find a mismatch between a page and GMGN's current documentation, please tell us through the contact page; the person responsible for these checks is named on about this guide. Pages we use most heavily include the GMGN fees guide and the GMGN trading guide.

The figures these methods produce are summarised on the GMGN AI overview page, which is where most readers should start.